X-Plane versus Microsoft Flight-Sim: which should you play? | PCGamesN

Flight Simulator X

X-Plane versus Microsoft Flight-Sim: which should you play?

For the majority of flight sim fans, virtual piloting starts and ends with the Microsoft Flight Simulator series. Yes it’s the granddaddy, yes it’s got more devotees than a Devo t-shirt kiosk (ask your parents), but it’s by no means the only option on the shelves when it comes to making your civil aviation simulation decision.

Of all the pretenders to the throne, perhaps the biggest is X-Plane from Laminar Research, now in its tenth edition. The chances are that unless you’re a fan already, you’ll have dismissed it as just another also-ran and moved on. Which would be a crying shame.

While Microsoft was ruling the airborne roost over on PCs in the early 90s, X-Plane snuck up on the flight sim market via the Mac. It introduced in 1993 primarily as an attempt to create a similar movement amongst those notorious games players in the Apple community. Being Mac-driven, naturally there was an emphasis on doing things more intellectually than us knuckle-dragging cavemen using PCs (their words... probably).

This mostly boiled down to something called ‘blade element theory’. Most flight simulators (Microsoft’s included) relied on what was essentially a very complicated game of Top Trumps to create their flight models. Planes all have large amounts of numerical values assigned to them, covering their varying degrees of aerodynamics, ultimately representing their individual flight behaviour dynamics. This relies on those figures being available (often a hindrance for more advanced or military vehicles), so often you’re flying an aircraft modeller’s best guess at how the plane should behave.

X-Plane’s approach is more scientific. Blade element theory models the individual parts that make up a plane (most notably the propeller blades and wings) from mathematical point of view, looking at how lift, drag and so on affect each separate part of the plane and then combining it all into a behavioural whole. More often than not, each part of a plane is further subdivided into smaller and smaller sections to make the simulation even more accurate.

The biggest advantage this gave X-Plane is to allow it to include an aircraft creation program in the core product. Users could spend many happy hours building the aircraft of their dreams, then tweaking numbers here and numbers there and seeing what effect all the tinkering has on how it flies (usually like a house brick with gossamer wings in my case). So comprehensive is it, several real-world aircraft manufacturers use X-Plane’s software in their design processes.

What X-Plane did was to take everything Microsoft was doing, make it more intellectually rigorous and give the user the tools to make their own content right out of the box. Then they slapped an appropriately Apple-y price tag on it. It proved popular enough that a Windows version followed three years later in 1996, a Linux version in 2004 and today even features versions that work on iPads, iPhones and Android platforms.

You don’t hang around in flight simulation for nearly twenty years without building a community around you and for the budding X-Planer wanting to go beyond the provided material. There’s as thriving a marketplace of X-Plane aircraft, scenery packs and more as there is for Microsoft’s flight stable. It’s certainly large enough to have spawned both an amateur scene putting material out there for the love of it, and a monetised industry of third-party add-ons that have the veneer of professionalism applied.

Of course, the big question remains if you’re already getting airborne on a regular basis with one of the Microsoft Flight Sim titles, is there any point making the switch to X-Plane?

The answer depends on what you’re looking for in your simulation.

For the casual flyer, content to potter around the skies in a less than totally realistic manner, maybe not. Microsoft’s offering is friendlier to the newcomer, with an immediately approachable front end. It provides an authentic experience of civil aviation. The default scenery is better too, although X-Plane 10’s auto-generated urban sprawls are certainly a step up from anything it’s offered before.

Perhaps the most important point to make, though, is that one of these games has the advantage of having parents that haven’t basically abandoned their child at the doorstep of well-meaning strangers and are still around to provide their precious bundle of joy with a future filled with hope, dreams and regular product updates. Clue: it’s not Microsoft’s baby.

FSX was released back in 2006 and since then, Microsoft’s development team has been gutted like a Sicilian fish. Earlier this year, one last attempt was made to push a Microsoft-branded flying experience onto the masses. Unfortunately, Microsoft Flight was a pared down abomination of the highest order, unsure of what it wanted to be and, therefore, satisfying none. Admitting defeat, Flight was pulled last August and anything to do with keeping virtual planes in virtual skies was marched out of Microsoft’s doors for good.

While, Microsoft has plummeted back to Earth, Laminar Research has kept plugging away. Version 10 of X-Plane was released in November 2011 and the team in South Carolina has no plans on stopping.

So, if nothing less than the most ultra-realistic flight dynamics are your bag, you enjoy being able to tweak the forces that affect the middle section of the Space Shuttle’s left wingtip in isolation to the way the transonic drag rise currently affects the internal aspect of the... and you like the idea of the product you’re flying having the benefit of a development team that is still working on the thing, X-Plane is the choice for you. It’s a seriously meaty flight sim package for the most carnivorous of virtual pilots.

Login or Register
1
+1
-0
TheKensta's picture
2

Been a flight simmer since FSX came out, and then played both when I got a copy of X-Plane 9.21 back in 2009. I used to be a FSX bias because it is 'a game and not a legit simulator'. Now though, I've changed my thoughts.

Ever since FSX lost developer support, I also decided to stop my support on it too, only flying 'once in a blue moon' on Carenado's planes. Now, if you're a extreme aerodynamic realism meanie like me, Hell, no doubt I'd say X-Plane, nothing beats it due to the Blade Element Theory it utilizes. Of course, I'd tune the graphics up until I get mid-30s and 40 FPS, which is good enough for a flight sim (laptop with Intel HD Graphics, mind you), for a more realistic experience. I do not know about you guys, but I've been raised by a private pilot who flown Cessnas and Beech Bonanzas all his life, and I've taken rides with him, and would argue that X-Plane comes as close to the real thing as it possibly could.

Lastly, about pick up and play, I'm against that. Every skilled person starts with a hard time in any activity, so I'm giving X-Plane a plus for being hard to start right off the bat. Oh, and please, get yourself some CH Products FlightSim Yoke and Pro Pedals before hopping into X-Plane.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

played both and I think it's funny people keep saying that one is better than the other, unlike the author, not offering one valid reason why it is so. Why? because you "said so"? I hope you don't actually think your opinion counts for anything other than yourselves and for those who are acting like the whole world should line up behind them, well... you know. Anyhow, I know real pilots and grew up on a real airport (not BY an real airport, ON ONE)... and have been around planes all my life. Obviously neither can compare to the real thing however, X-plane has got the dynamics in the bag much better than microsoft ever did (most recent version 10). Some of the controls may not be available on some of the planes that you would find on MS's but usually it is because they wont do much for those who are not actually there (turn on the heater, it's getting cold in here!) The only (ONLY) disappointing part of Xplane is that they got my hopes up with the Space shuttle but as it turns out you don't get to really 'fly' it beyond 'sitting in' on parts of a mission. But like i said before, dynamics on all those planes, details on airports and cities they are located in, are top notch. And the graphics seem to come at a cheaper price. You can still play it even if you have a cheap 40$ nvidia geforce video card. I found MFS seriously impaired (on the forementioned, and.. even on my 300$ ati hd card). X plane also runs wonderfully on linux which could be where much of the high end 3D games and software of the future might be going... MS has been having bad luck lately! :)

1
+1
-0
fsxn00b's picture
6

fsx for the win, just much more fun to play

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

X-Plane. Important to have a developer who is actively supporting their software. Give it some time, and it will surpass Flight Sim X in all aspects!

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

I've tried both but I like FSX due to the support for other software. X-Plane is very good graphically. I fly multi engine Airbus and Boeing. I still continue to spend far to much money on FSX including hardware as well as software.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

FSX has a wider range of addons allowing for a more diverse and realistic experience. X-Plane looks reasonable out of the box and runs far better. FSX is current but X-Plane will likely be the future.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

A great idea; look forward to the high-res version, with on screen-hands - for IL2 and Rise of Flight

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

I've been a simmer for more years than i care to remember, and for years ive heard this question. In my option its not an easy question to answer, I think i would say fly both. Saying play is totally wrong for a sim.

Both sims are stunning in their own right.

For graphics and aircraft at the moment i would say FSX is currently in the lead, however physics wise nothing touches Xplane.

of course with the fact microsoft has stopped developing FSX, then X plane is certainly in a great position to overtake FSX as the flight sim of choice.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

FSX for add ons X plane for future dev.

Occulus support essential for development of both.

1
+1
-0
robfisheruk's picture
2

ive been flying since 2004 and ill always prefer fsx over x-plane

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

In my personal opinion I prefer FSX, I believe it is more user friendly, The interface is easier understand and the control scheme is more friendly to beginners through to experts, The pick up and play ability makes the experience is one that allows some one who has never flown before pick it up, Go through the tutorials and begin flying, I started my flying on FSX and have only improved with each flight, Being able to change the difficulty settings on the go and before is a nice touch as not everyone can fly like an airline pilot instantly and just want a bit of fun, With the added multiplayer it allows you to have a friend join you in the cockpit and help them fly on the sim, Even have an experience in the ATC, X-Plane is not as good having not long had a play earlier today, I found it is hard to use and not as nice with the interface, The only thing it has is the graphics, I will always prefer FSX.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

As I am interested in military sims, especially World War II, I would lean towards Microsoft Flight Simulator as opposed to X-plane. However, you want a good online WW2 sim try Aces High by www.hitechcreations.com (end of plug).

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

Which is best...X-plane has a lot of appeal to me as it runs on OS X (Mac). However I still use FSX more as at the moment it is better supported for addons. Though X-Plane is catching up. Plus FSX is not supported by Microsoft anymore.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

I think Xplane is better for the modles of the plane and the engines

1
+1
-0
robfisheruk's picture
2

I find that for the instruction of cadets, the fact that flight simulator x is more user friendly and simpler to use makes it better for our needs.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

Flight simulator x is great for scenery and realism.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

Prefer MSF have not used Xplane.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

xplane for performance and graphics, flight sim for addons and developer addons

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

Fsx is best because of all of the addons and the better graphics. Xplane 10 can be complex for the new user

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

So far FSX still get my bucks, but that could change

1
+1
-0
avatar
2

Xplane coolio

1
+1
-0
avatar
2

Flaming Cliffs rules

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

I prefer x-plane 10 because it is more realistic

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

use fsx as there are far more add ons and trust microsoft

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

X-plane. More realistic

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

FSX all the way at the mo, headset is brill.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

Have used Flightsim since first version, bought X-Plane but never even installed it, Will get around to it one day!

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

X-plane has way more developer support allong with realistic fluidics so I would choose that for a home built simulator. FSX is a bit more friendly and the raw graphics are better allthough its architecture is way more processor heavy than it should be. Casual = FSX Simulation = X-plane

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

X-Plane handles twin screen out of the box - if you've not got the best graphics card! However they are both great.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

Really VERY interesting to see Oculus Rift being demo-ed at RAFM Cosford BTW! FSX so far for 3D with nVidia 3D Stereo Vision, plus DX10 with self-shading... but X-plane for the flight model and AI ships rolling and pitching at sea!! ;-)

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

FSX 'COS I have invested time and money and the brain cells are hard pressed to take on new ideas at present

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

fsx

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

good idea more info whats the price //

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

fsx just about to try occulus

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

only ever played fsx so i will say fsx although i would like to try x plane in the future.

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

Only ever tried FSX so it's got to be that:)

1
+1
-0
Predator's picture
1

flight sim x ftw

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

it was really good because i was like i was actually there

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

brilliant and look forward to seeing it in action

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

cool VR headset will be great with higher res

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

X PLANE JUST WINS FOR ME WITH THE GRAPHICS

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

flight simulator is better because it is more realistic and easier to use

1
+1
-0
avatar
1

X-Plane great and different models

1
+1
-0
Comrade Vorgon's picture
1

X-plane for the flight model, MSFS for instrument procedures.

1
+1
-0
greenbriggs9's picture
1

How can anybody possibly say that x-plane is better?

I have both, and fsx with orbx scenery is far superior.

I have ftx global and all the regions in the UK.

Also have ngx 737 800 add on plane.

Who cares about flight characteristics, when x-plane graphics are terrible.

You get fsx with orbx scenery, Rex essentials for the weather, dx10 fixer and ezca for realistic movement, then fsx beats x-plane in every conceivable way.

I have an Intel I7 3770k clocked on water at a very stable 4.8 ghtz, Nvidia gtx 980, 8 gig of corsair ram, windows 7 64, 3 tb hdd and 800w corsair psu.

Yet with a very powerful and expensive system like this, x-plane is pulling terrible fps even on moderate settings.

I wouldn't mind too much, but the graphics are about ten years out of date.

On fsx, I can easily achieve 50 fps over New York, and it looks absolutely amazing.

X-plane has been deleted off my hdd and will never return.

I have give it 3 chances now.

Version 5, 6 and now 10.

It's not a simulator, it's an expensive joke.

1
+1
-0
TheKensta's picture
2

I'm utterly sorry, but I can say your PC is a laughable joke if it can't run X-Plane on moderate with those filthy-rich specifications. I'm on an HP Pavilion 15 laptop with:

Intel i5-4210U @ 1.7 GHz un-Turbo Boosted, 2.4 GHz Turbo Boosted

Windows 8.1 x64

450 GB HDD

4 GB DDR3 RAM

Heck, this is not filthy-rich specs and I can run X-Plane 9 on High Graphics with 20 FPS to spare, and 56 FPS on Medium over Seattle, Washington.

What's an expensive joke is your PC and not X-Plane, I hate to say.

Try these free to play games
?

These are affiliate links - clicking them and playing the games directly supports PCGamesN

Spotlight
?

Our Spotlight units plug content our journalists have made, that our advertisers want to promote. Sometimes the promotion is paid for, but the content they go to is always independent with no client oversight or approval.

Alienware - Game VictoriousTurtle Beach
El Centro air show to fly this weekend

Flight Simulator X

El Centro air show to fly this weekend

Flight Simulator X makes some Dangerous Approaches in its first add-on in yonks

Flight Simulator X makes some Dangerous Approaches in its first add-on in yonks

Microsoft Flight Simulator X to be refueled with new updates post-Steam release

Microsoft Flight Simulator X to be refueled with new updates post-Steam release

Trains, planes and Dovetail Games: Train Simulator developer working on new Microsoft Flight Simulator

Trains, planes and Dovetail Games: Train Simulator developer working on new Microsoft Flight Simulator

FSX Blue Angels release their 2013 tour dates

FSX Blue Angels release their 2013 tour dates

Combat Pilot offers a free ‘flight screening’ program

Combat Pilot offers a free ‘flight screening’ program

Saitek Combat Pilot - A closer look at training

Flight Simulator X

Saitek Combat Pilot - A closer look at training

Carenado takes its latest bird into the skies

Carenado takes its latest bird into the skies

Take a ride in the currently grounded 787 Dreamliner in FlightSim X

Take a ride in the currently grounded 787 Dreamliner in FlightSim X

Ultimate Traffic 2 hits 2013 with 1.8 million aircraft

Ultimate Traffic 2 hits 2013 with 1.8 million aircraft

Crop Dusting and Jungle Diving - Two unusual aircraft for FSX

Crop Dusting and Jungle Diving - Two unusual aircraft for FSX

Is This The Ultimate 146 Collection?

Is This The Ultimate 146 Collection?

Saitek Combat Pilot Goes Live

Saitek Combat Pilot Goes Live

Mykonos for Flight Simulator X review in pictures

Mykonos for Flight Simulator X review in pictures

The Best Microsoft Flight Simulator X Add-Ons

The Best Microsoft Flight Simulator X Add-Ons

French scenery duo team up for secret ‘Normandy’ project

French scenery duo team up for secret ‘Normandy’ project

Traffic 360 adds over half a million AI planes to Flight Simulator X's skies

Traffic 360 adds over half a million AI planes to Flight Simulator X's skies

PCGamesN’s 'Why-Fly' network gets airborne

PCGamesN’s 'Why-Fly' network gets airborne

FSX Blue Angels show off aerobatic skills at virtual air show

FSX Blue Angels show off aerobatic skills at virtual air show

Vintage airline starts world rally

Vintage airline starts world rally

Travel the virtual world in style

Travel the virtual world in style