AMD’s beefy Vega GPU design is done… just don’t expect to see it for a while | PCGamesN

AMD’s beefy Vega GPU design is done… just don’t expect to see it for a while

AMD Vega 10

AMD’s graphics guru, and senior VP, Raja Koduri, has been out in Shanghai with their GPU design team celebrating the finalising of the high-end Vega 10 silicon.

Which games will push the next generation of graphics cards? Here’s our pick of the best upcoming PC games to stretch their silicon.

We’re all poised to welcome AMD’s first 14nm graphics chip, the Polaris-based Radeon RX 480, next week, but with Nvidia and AMD coming at their respective new GPU ranges from different angles we’re not really going to know how the latest battle for the high-end will end up until there are genuinely comparative cards out in the wild.

Nvidia has gone big with their first Pascal cards, the high-end, super-expensive GTX 1080 and GTX 1070, while AMD is focusing on the other end, trying to nail the mainstream, volume market with their Polaris cards, the RX 480, RX 470 and RX 460.

AMD’s Vega 10 chip though is the manufacturer’s high-end GPU designed to take on the might of Nvidia’s GTX 1080, and potentially even the GP102-powered GTX 1080 Ti and Pascal Titan cards too.

AMD Vega design team 

AMD’s Shanghai team has now finalised the hardware design and is shipping responsibility over to in-house and third-party developers to take it further. Their GPU roadmap has the Vega parts scheduled to appear in 2017, with some reports expecting an appearance in the first quarter, though Koduri himself has already been managing expectation saying there’s still a 'long way to go.' 

There could be some sort of appearance at CES in January, but we wouldn’t expect an actual release until much further into 2017.

That may still tie in nicely with when we expect to see the Pascal-based Titan card - historically released in springtime - lining up a potential GPU battle royale between AMD’s Vega 10 and Nvidia’s GP102 GPUs. We've already leased a Pacific island in preparation, covered it in hidden cameras and deathly traps, so we can dump a selection of the high-end cards on it when they finally get released. 

There have already been a fair few rumours and leaks surrounding what we should expect from the Vega 10 chip, with most expecting the fully-specced GPU to come with a hefty 4,096 cores/shaders, be based on the same 14nm finFET process as Polaris and come sporting the second generation of Hynix’s high-bandwidth memory (HBM).

Combined with the expected high-efficiency AMD has baked into their Polaris GPUs, that ought to make the Vega 10 cards seriously powerful beasts. Though whether we’re going to see them appear next year as the range-topping Radeon RX 490, the successor to the Fury cards or as a separate 500-series we still don’t know.

What we do know though is that AMD is also set to release their brand new Zen CPU design, in the form of the eight-core / sixteen thread Summit Ridge chip early next year too. With a Zen CPU and a Vega GPU (or two?) humming away in your rig a future with high-end, fully-AMD specced PCs looks a distinct possibility.

Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
DuoBlaze avatarKeyvan avatarAnakhoresis avatarjmahyoung avatar
Keyvan Avatar
1 Year ago

It'd be hard for me to go AMD. They do definitely have what it takes to tackle NVIDIA. There's only one problem. Convincing the game devs/publishers to start using AMD's super-features. They'll go for 80% of the market (NVIDIA). Sad but true.

Anakhoresis Avatar
1 Year ago

I'm an AMD guy (for graphics) and it's so sad that this happens. I remember reading some comments about an article about how even if AMDs new cards have equal or even a bit greater raw performance than Nvidia, it won't matter in most games because of optimisation that is Nvidia tilted. Which is so true, and it's a shame. Never mind even super features, just having equal optimisation would be nice.

DuoBlaze Avatar
1 Year ago

First HBM2 card with 8+GB of memory to hit shelves will be the one I buy. The frame rate advantage playing at 3440x1440 and 4K is a bad deal when compared to GDDR5 or even GDDR5X. I hope AMD wins the race because of my expensive freesync displays and I plan to buy a HDMI 2.0 freesync television.

jmahyoung Avatar
1 Year ago

Both of the major game consoles (PS4 and XBox One) use AMD chips internally, with AMD GCN stream processors.

You can bet that all the major game developers who make games for consoles will be very well versed in AMD specific optimizations- in fact, since their designs are in silicon for both PS4 and XBox One, there is more of a case to optimize for AMD only if they only had to choose one. Choosing NVIDIA only means you won't optimize for AAA titles for major game consoles- unthinkable.