The best CPU for gaming might not necessarily mean the best CPU full stop. Games utilise CPUs differently to many other applications, and on top of this, you have your own preferences to take into account. What’s your budget? Do you need great multi-core and multithreading ability for your uses outside of gaming, or will raw single-core gaming performance do? Whatever the case, there are plenty of CPUs to choose from in 2020, and we’re here to help you make that decision.
Despite the dominance of multi-core CPUs in today’s gaming rigs, the difficulty in coding for chips with multiple processor cores has meant we’re still not seeing many modern game engines taking full advantage of the powerful CPUs many of us now have in our machines. In fact, since AMD has decided to take the fight to Intel in terms of core-count, even six cores is becoming more and more common.
But games are slow to catch up with our tech-harvesting ways. We had hoped with the rise in DirectX 12 games, and AMD’s promise of burgeoning Vulkan API support from developers, that the CPU would become more and more important for good gaming performance. That hasn’t come to pass, and the GPU is still the most important component of your gaming rig. But that doesn’t mean any old processor will do – you still need a quality chip to get the most out of your graphics card.
What is the best CPU for gaming in 2020?
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is our pick as the best processor you can buy today. AMD may have usurped the top spot for the best CPU for gaming with its latest Ryzen 3000 processors, but it still has competition from Intel’s Coffee Lake chips in the gaming department.
But this list is changing rapidly with every new AMD Zen 2 chip we benchmark…
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
What we like
Fantastic single core performance
Heaps of multithreaded pace
Wraith Stealth included
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 isn’t just a great gaming CPU with serious multi-threading chops, it’s also an incredibly good value chip, too. Previous incumbent, the Ryzen 5 2600, remains a solid choice for the value-oriented PC builder while stocks last and prices are low, but the Zen 2 architecture adds more than enough value to justify the latest and greatest chip.
With a 15% IPC increase over second-gen Ryzen and Zen+, the Ryzen 5 3600 brings even more affordable gaming power to the mainstream market. At this price point, it not only creeps up close to Intel’s gaming lead, but outruns it – and does so without demanding great quantities of power or pennies.
Read our full AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review.
great for superior cooling
AMD RYZEN 5 3600X
What we like
Zen 2 performance bump
Wraith Spire included
The Ryzen 5 3600X is an impressive CPU that once again proves AMD’s upward trajectory. While there’s definitely a strong case to be made for purchasing the cheaper of the two 7nm Ryzen 5 chips, the X suffix nets you higher clock speeds and a more capable cooler than its cheaper sibling.
It also offers a significant bump in performance over its predecessor, and Zen 2’s 15% IPC increase works wonders in-game. Paired with the right mainstream GPU we’re looking at a new standard for value-oriented gaming PC builds – all thanks to AMD’s Ryzen 5 lineup.
Read our full AMD Ryzen 5 3600X review.
great for the wallet
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
What we like
Decent single core performance…
…with genuine multi-threading pace
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 isn’t just a great gaming CPU with serious multi-threading chops, it’s also an incredibly good-value chip, too. The Ryzen 5 3600 manages to usurp the top spot thanks to Zen 2 and 7nm, but while the Ryzen 5 2600 remains in stock its low price maintains it as a tempting offer nonetheless.
The 8400 still retains a slight gaming performance lead, but the fact the Ryzen 5 2600 costs considerably less than the rival Intel chip means that there’s only going to be one winner in this battle. With a little judicious overclocking, at a level which isn’t going to put any undue strain on your silicon, you can get the same level of performance as the 2600X.
Read our full AMD Ryzen 5 2600 review.
Great for gaming
Intel Core i5 8400
What we like
Six Intel cores
Great gaming frame rates
I’ve been struggling with which chip to pick from the i5 8400 and the new Ryzen 5 processors as to the best CPU for gaming. While the 8400 does have marginally better gaming performance I’d struggle to really recommend it as an overall package. The mainstream H370 and B360 chipsets mean the non K-series Coffee Lake SKUs have an affordable platform, but the 14nm production issues mean the CPUs are still more expensive than AMD’s competing Ryzen.
When the 8400 was cheaper it was a tempting option, thanks to its traditional Intel gaming performance lead, but as it is you’re paying more for less CPU power. And that could hobble your rig going forward.The future-proofing, multi-threaded chops, and near-as-dammit gaming performance, means the Ryzen 2 CPU is the better overall CPU.
Read our full Intel Core i5 8400 review.
great for overclockers
Intel Core i5 9600K
What we like
Classic Intel gaming performance
I genuinely thought that, after what happened with previous Intel generations, the K-series Core i5 would be the go-to chip for the best CPU crown. But because the Ryzen 5 2600 has the multithreaded chops, and the Core i5 8400 is just so damned good when it comes to pure gaming performance, there’s almost no need to spend the extra on the 9600K.
Where the 9600K does have relevance is its overclocking skills. The Coffee Lake chip is capable of delivering the same level of multi-threaded CPU performance as the competing 12-thread Ryzen 5 with a stable and modest overclock. To be honest, that seems to have been this processor’s raison d’être – beating Ryzen at all costs, but you need a high-end Z370 or Z390 board to get there.
Ryzen 9 3900X
What we like
12 cores and 24 threads
Fastest Ryzen processor to date
PCIe 4.0 support
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X currently rules the Zen 2 roost and the multithreaded market. With 12 cores split into 24 threads, it’s got the raw power to chomp through almost any creative or professional workload. And thanks to Zen 2’s unique modular topology, the 3900X’s dual chiplets manage to clock up to an impressive 4.6GHz. That’s enough to drive impressive frame times in games, too.
There’s also little need to splash out on the latest motherboard. With an AM4 socket package fit for most Ryzen motherboards in the market, the Ryzen 9 3900X is not only in a league of its own, but a terrific value proposition, too. It’s only the Ryzen 7 3700X’s equally great value and gaming chops that makes it a better pick for most gamers in need of a little extra horsepower.
Read our full Ryzen 9 3900X review
great for productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
What we like
Serious multi-threaded performance
Great value for a 16-thread CPU
Top gaming performance
If you’re after a mix of multi-threaded computational chops, decent gaming performance, and great value then look no further than the Ryzen 7 3700X. It’s a well-priced Zen 2 CPU that drastically improves on the overall performance of its predecessor, the 2700X, and yet requires way less power. Importantly it’s also considerably cheaper than either Intel’s or eight-core 9700K or i9 9900K.
But it’s still got gaming performance that’s comparable with Intel’s top chips when you’re gaming at 1440p or 4K. That makes it a great chip in productivity terms and a CPU with gaming performance that is practically indistinguishable from the Intel competition in any GPU-bound game.
Read our full AMD Ryzen 7 3700X review.
great for gaming
Intel Core i9 9900K
What we like
The fastest gaming processor around
Perfect CPU for RTX 2080 Ti
The Intel Core i9 9900K is the world’s fastest gaming CPU, but its painfully high price tag means it doesn’t get our nod as the outright best CPU for gaming. But if money really isn’t a thing for you then the octa-core from Intel is the best processor to pair with your high-end graphics card. But it’s inevitably in short supply right now, meaning prices are utterly prohibitive.
When it comes to GPU-bound games, which are the majority of titles, even with a proper high-end graphics card there isn’t a huge amount of difference between the in-game performance of Intel’s top chip and AMD’s high-end octa-core CPU, the 3700X, especially at 4K. It is a great chip from a technical and performance point of view, but as a value proposition – especially in the face of fierce competition from AMD – it’s a bit of a tough one to recommend.
Read our full Intel Core i9 9900K review.
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
What we like
Integrated Vega graphics
Impressive overclocking chops
The mix of serious quad-core CPU performance with the addition of surprisingly effective Vega GPU silicon make the this APU a winner whether you’re plumbing a graphics card into your rig or not. As the basis for a budget gaming rig the 2200G can deliver decent 720p gaming performance so long as you’re not too ambitious about the game settings that is. It’s the best CPU for gaming on a budget.
The Ryzen 5 2400G does have more about it on that front, but it’s a good chunk more expensive and the performance difference can largely be made up by overclocking the internal GPU. And, because AMD has also managed to jam a full quad-core Ryzen CPU into the package it performs admirably when you plumb in a discrete GPU. It loses a little against the 1300X on straight CPU performance, potentially because it’s got half the L3 cache, but in gaming terms it’s close enough that it doesn’t really make a difference.
Read our full AMD Ryzen 3 2200G review.
great for budget cpu chops
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
What we like
Quad-core CPU for dual-core money
Solid gaming performance…
I love budget kit. No, scratch that, I love budget kit that turns up offering the same sort of performance you would normally have to pay through the nose for. Loving your work, AMD. The 1300X was the best budget gaming chip around when it first launched, packing four overclockable Zen cores into a dual-core price tag. And it’s only been overtaken by the slightly cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
The overall Ryzen 3 platform is excellent too. When you can pick up the overclockable 1300X and a powerful B350 motherboard for the same price as a multiplier-locked Core i5 on its own – it becomes mighty hard to make a case for Intel. That pricing means you can build yourself a Ryzen 3 gaming rig powered by the GTX 1060 for the same price as you’d pay for a locked down Core i5 rig with just a GTX 1050 Ti. And you know which one’s going to be winning the benchmarking battle there, right?
Read our full AMD Ryzen 3 1300X review.
So these are interesting times, then. Where for most of our PC gaming lives we’ve been recommending whichever Intel processor suited your budget it’s no longer that simple. And that’s down to the engineering efforts AMD has put into creating its latest Ryzen lineup of CPUs.
AMD has made it very difficult to recommend an Intel processor as the overall best CPU for gaming, given the fact that you get so much more for your money with an AMD chip right now. That and the gaming performance delta between them is now so small as to be completely inconsequential.
At the mainstream end it’s the six-core, 12-thread Ryzen 5 3600 for the win. It’s a great-value, processing monster – enough so that the 3600X is almost irrelevant.
The Intel i5 8400 comes close, but thanks to Intel’s 14nm production woes, its pricing continues to fluctuate. And, if you’re doing serious PC work alongside your gaming hobby, it’s six-core, six-thread design sits behind the AMD chips in pure multithreaded computational terms.
At the high-end the eight-core, 16-thread Intel Core i9 9900K has lost out to the Ryzen 9 3900X. The Intel chip is simply more expensive and only really offers a tangible performance difference in CPU-bound games. Of which there are few. But over time, as GPU power increases, that will change and the performance differential displayed by the two chips will increase.
And for budget chips, the Ryzen 3 2200G will deliver a decent level of CPU performance and has a Vega GPU baked into it which will allow for 720p gaming without the need for a graphics card. A bona fide bargain.