Galactic Civilizations 3 review | PCGamesN - Page 2

Galactic Civilizations 3 review: Page 2

Stardock’s races are blessed with a rich history and distinct personalities. When controlled by the AI, they act as you would expect them to given the lore surrounding them and their in-game description, and they are generally consistent. That doesn’t mean they aren’t capable of being devious or surprising, though. The peaceful Altarians can become the aggressor in a war, if pushed, and I’ve seen the Drengin attempt to conquer a planet through the force of their influence rather than an armada. 

The game is a race, a marathon, with the finish line being a variety of victory types: conquest, influence, research, time limit and ascension, where your race transforms into higher beings if you collect a bunch of crystals. So even if you’re not throwing your weight around with a huge fleet of capital ships bristling with the most advanced mass drivers, you’re always competing, and the galaxy is always hostile, even if all the aliens are smiling and making deals with you. 

Choosing a victory goal is something that should be done early on, as it informs how you develop your empire, but that focus on the end goal doesn’t prove to be limiting. 

As the Terrans, I attempted to win the galaxy over with my incredible charm and cultured ways. Peacefully. I built influence-generating buildings on my worlds, constructed starbases with culture modules and researched tech that made my empire lovely and appealing. The game ended in a galaxy-wide war and trillions dead. 

My attempts to win over the populations of other worlds had not gone ignored by the other empires, two of which promptly declared war. In an effort to defend Earth and my colonies, I had to rapidly build up defensive fleets and research new, deadly weapons. The war dragged on until I was finally able to start fielding capital ships. Eventually I destroyed my enemies, and I found myself with considerably more influence than before thanks to the new worlds I’d conquered. My vastly expanded empire was able to more effectively spread Terran culture, and it wasn’t long before I won the game with an influence victory. Thanks, war. 

While aggression can take many forms in Galactic Civilizations III, from trade competition to tech races, war will inevitably flare up, and that means you’ll need fleets. Each race comes with a small array of pre-designed ships that cover the different weapon types and ship classes, and it’s perfectly possible to win a war by just relying on them. It’s just that it’s nowhere near as satisfying as building your own ships and sending them out to burn the galaxy. 

The ship designer is an incredible tool, allowing for the customisation of both the ship’s appearance and its weapons, engines, defensive modules and support features like cargo holds for colonists, soldiers and trade goods. Every component can be resized, duplicated, repositioned and, if you fancy, made to spin. 

Here’s a ship I made in beta: 

And here’s an Altarian ship I made when I wasn’t being puerile:

Big ships with big guns and troop transports full of burly space marines are great, but they’re useless if the enemy can counter them. A fleet specialising in lasers and protected by defensive shields won’t fare well against an opposing fleet sporting mass drivers and heavy armour. It’s the rock, paper, scissors formula, but with the added complexity of worrying about mass and miniaturisation.An empire focused on miniaturisation and reducing the mass of its components can, simply put, throw more stuff onto ships. They might have inferior weapons, but they have more of them. 

Wars feel appropriately tense, and aggression is tempered by a need to protect so many assets. The loss of a world can herald an economic collapse if war as already strained it. Empires are littered with customisable starbases, too, and they are big targets. They mine resources, spread influence, protect borders and improve trade -- they are absolutely necessary and the destruction of one can really harm an empire. 

Ship-building facilities are now off world rather than being bound to worlds, which is a small change with a significant impact. There’s a benefit, since various worlds can now sponsor a single shipyard, but they can also being targets, floating out there in space. Losing a shipyard is obviously devastating in the middle of a war, and they don’t have their own defenses. 

A quirk that’s been carried over from Galactic Civilizations II can unfortunately put a bit of a dampner on conquest. AI empires, when faced with defeat, can just give up completely and offer all of their worlds up to another faction. In one game, this happened to me twice in a row, so all these worlds I was about to conquer suddenly ended up in the hands of another empire. It rendered the war pointless, because even though I’d won, all I had really done was empower another potential enemy. 

What made it so frustrating is that, at no point, did either of those empires attempt to make peace with me first. It’s not a problem if they are down to their last world, but sometimes it happens when most of their empire is intact. A tweak to make it less likely for a big empire to give up so easily would nip this in the bud. 

The thing is, I rarely want to completely wipe out an empire. I usually like to settle things after I’ve grabbed a few worlds. There’s a meaty diplomacy system to play around with, where a long list of treaties and alliances can be brokered, gifts can be given, tithes can be demanded, and resources can be traded. The empires can also gather and pass bills in a galactic parliament, where they can attempt to exert their will across the entire galaxy and, if they are in charge, even decide what bills to put up for a vote. It's a popularity contest, and one that pays significant dividends like the ability to redistribute the wealth of rich empires or end wars with a vote.

How an empire reacts to a diplomatic offer depends on a lot of factors. Empires that share borders might feel a bit threatened by each other, they won’t be too pleased if influence starbases are being used to culture flip one of their world and they might think another empire’s a bit rubbish if they have a weak military. All of these factors are clearly displayed on the diplomacy screen. The UI and tooltips have come along way since Galactic Civilizations II. 

Another serious factor that plays into how empires view each other is ideology. There are three ideologies in Galactic Civilizations III: benevolent, pragmatic and malevolent, and empires generally won’t be too keen on aliens who don’t share their ideology – though it’s not a dealbreaker. 

Random events, which are guaranteed to pop up when a new world is colonised and can also crop up at any time, result in points being earned toward a specific ideology. It’s where you can do a bit of empire roleplaying. An event offers up three choices, each one representing a specific ideology and offering unique bonuses and trade offs. A newly-colonised world might host a strange alien artefact that kills people but also could be valuable to the empire’s scientists. A benevolent leader would, of course, destroy the artifact, perhaps leading to an approval boost, while a malevolent one would be unlikely to care how many people die, as long as the research rewards are reaped.  

Ideology points can then be spent on handy bonuses. One of the first rewards that you can unlock in the pragmatic ideology immediately gives you three constructors, which can be used to build starbases and shipyards. In the benevolent ideology, you can get a free, fully-loaded colony ship instead. Either of those options are a huge boon for a growing empire, but choosing one doesn’t lock out the other. It will be harder to reach the highest tier bonuses, but the option to dabble in multiple ideologies is there. 

I get a bit lost in Galactic Civilizations III. Not the type of lost where you wander aimlessly, a clueless shambles, but the type of lost where you’re exploring and you just forget what you were meant to be doing. So much can happen in a single turn, and a tiny tweak to the circular economic slider – it’s split between wealth, manufacturing and research – can have a dramatic impact, making the difference between going bust and getting back in the black, or researching a desperately needed technology now, or in four more turns when it will be too late.  

So I fiddle and change and tweak everything. A turn can take an hour when I’m adjusting the weapons on my latest ship or going through each planet and moving the economic slider on each individual world before even moving a fleet or giving my worlds new build orders. I bounce from menu to menu, immersing myself in the governance of my burgeoning galactic empire. 

I worried that, after years of playing its predecessor and all of its expansions, I would be too familiar with Galactic Civilizations III. I worried that I’d get a bit tired of it too quickly. This hasn’t remotely been the case. I’m hooked in the same way I was with the last game, and not because it’s stayed the same, but because it’s managed to strike that balance between the comfortingly familiar and the refreshingly new. 


Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
Dog Pants avatarOcid avatarKazriko avatar
Dog Pants Avatar
3 Years ago

Kudos for getting a shitting dog into the second paragraph of a review about a space 4X game.


It's telling that a lot of the review picks fault with aspects of the game, and it concludes with a glowing recommendation and a 9/10 score. Says to me that even with its flaws it's a damn fine game. A release day purchase.

Ocid Avatar
3 Years ago

Damnit. I need to wait a month before I can grab this,

Kazriko Avatar
3 Years ago

Altarians pleasant. Hah, sure. If you're playing a Benevolent race, or Terrans, they're friendly enough. I was playing the Iridium Corporation, a pragmatic race of merchants and traders, and they were the first race to declare war on me. Even the Drengin were friendlier to me than the Altarians, and they kept commenting on how they were eventually going to eat me. The Iconians, Terrans, and Thalians were all much friendlier as well, I'm probably going to end the game with an alliance victory between the 4 of us.