Needs a "This comment was sponsored by CIG" disclaimer.
Needs a "This comment was sponsored by a Troll" disclaimer :)
You are referring sometimes to Goons or DS and mostly describing CIG as a "development hell" for employee... i totally disagree with such statement.
Are you a Goon or DS fan or employee? Why are you even asking who is doing what and for which reason? Are you looking for juicy anon source like the clown like to refer to every so often? :)
My time is my single wealth and I provide it with generosity to defend what is the most important: value truth versus lie or uneducated remarks. The mass of stupid remarks from people with clearly zero knowledge about project life or finance is enough to attract my attention.
This is quite entertaining indeed :)
Ok, this is such an irrational defensive response to a civil question. How strange.
Out of curiousity, are you a CIG employee?
I see your name on almost every SC article. That must take a fair bit of work.
CIG literally does not care about the liar and hypocrite Derek Smart and his Goons say, which is why they never respond to any of their unintelligent babble. They will respond to there being general rumors that come from other sources and ended up being in the gaming news. haven't you noticed the gaming new industry literally ignores everything Derek Smart says? That is because it has been proven wrong time and time and time again, sure he ends up being kind of right at a rare time, you know the whole "broken clock is right 2x a day", it also helps that Derek Smart likes to make contradictory posts, so if one is right and the other one is wrong he gets to jump for joy like the 6 year old kid that he acts like.
Errr so what? It is not about whether CIG cares, my post was that the goons would find it funny. That is all.
For someone who says that Derek Smart matters so little you sure do seem to be making a big deal out of him.... strange that.
Depends. If you were working on a project would you prefer to be continually told that you had to gimp things to hit a release date/budget (Funny, people keep complaining about current AAA games doing this), or would you rather being able to do things to the absolute best of your ability and go big, even if it meant doing extra work?
But how could he say they would deliver it as their end of the year goal if they hadn't even started a schedule, that would mean they have no real idea of what it entails and they're giving a date already...
Saw this being discussed on another forum, here are CR's words from Gamescom.
"So it's our big end of the year release. So err you know, we're going to get it out end of the year...hopefully not on December 19th like last year, but it is a big one so you know, so we're not making... I get shot for making promises but that's our goal."
That definitely sounds more of an assured statement than a guestimate with caveats.
That is exactly the point. they provided a very details schedule. SThey provide schedule on backers demand and the 3 they already provided have been met. Backers will get 3.0 to 3.2 by end of 2017. Is it possible that some stuff can be removed/posponed and some others added? yes. The most important is to get regular important patch and 3.0 is the one of them.