Star Wars Battlefront's matchmaking system will keep things "fair and even" according to DICE | PCGamesN

Star Wars Battlefront's matchmaking system will keep things "fair and even" according to DICE

Star Wars Battlefront matchmaking

Ahead of the Star Wars Battlefront, which starts soon, DICE revealed that the game would be shackled to a skill-based matchmaking system, and that a server browser wouldn’t be available. 

It’s something that really should be a standard in a multiplayer shooter, though has been notably absent from several big titles. These sorts of limitations are never met with cheers, so why have DICE decided to use matchmaking only? 

Will Star Wars Battlefront make it on our list of the best Star Wars PC games? I don't know, I'm not psychic. That's why I'm asking you. 

“The nature of the matchmaker that we have is to just ensure that people have a fair and even playground,” design director Niklas Fegraeus told PC Gamer. “That's the thing. We want all Star Wars fans to be able to play this game and have a good time, and in doing that, we want to make sure that whenever players jump in, they get matchmade to players of their own level, their own skill, so they can have fun and a fair playing field. “

Egalitarian matchmaking doesn’t sound too bad, but making things “fair and even” doesn’t always make them more fun. There’s no room for underdogs to surprise a group of advanced players and no opportunities for groups to set up their own servers just for themselves. 

I suggest that it’s options that people want, not a system telling them who to play with, and a server browser offers that. You can see every possible match you can join and then pick the one that suits you rather than leaving your fate up to an algorithm. 

And hey, it’s not like matchmaking and server browsers can’t co-exist. They do, frequently. That strikes me as more egalitarian than forcing an even playing field on everyone. 

Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
Gainsayer avatarNihlusGreen avatarRadioActiveLobster avatarFlappers avatar
Gainsayer Avatar
2 Years ago

Yeah, this is just a piss-poor excuse to have no server browser, eventually leading to the games death by the lack of community support, so that they can sell you the next yearly release. Just like Call of Duty.

Besides, this matchmaking is all fine and dandy right until someone switches team to the winning one, because they're a sore loser, eventually resulting in an unfair game anyway. So yeah, maybe they've even removed changing teams, because they want it "fair".

If you want to kill a game, do it properly.

RadioActiveLobster Avatar
2 Years ago

Me: I want to play with my friends all on one server.

EA/DICE: No, fuck you.

NihlusGreen Avatar
2 Years ago

Angels Fall Far could be what were wanting in place of this

Flappers Avatar
2 Years ago

It's a shame that some journalists (PCGamer in this case) don't want to give them an honest statement. Why didn't they counter their explanation by saying that matchmaking can exist alongside server browsers?

Hell, EA Dice have already done it with BF3/4. Why can't they do it here too?