Nvidia will help Respawn get Titanfall running at 4K | PCGamesN

Nvidia will help Respawn get Titanfall running at 4K

This particular image will never quite reach 4k - unless you have a really big monitor. Because it is a wallpaper.

Most PC shooters grow old and wrinkly fast. A little known fact: Quake’s levels shrivelled like prunes through the noughties - so embarrassing the game that it covered its shrunken scenery with cardboard boxes, now commonly mistaken for polygonal architecture.

Titanfall - which we rather liked in our Titanfall review -  will escape the fate that’s befallen its predecessors, at least for a short while: Nvidia are determined to work with Respawn to keep their vertical shooter “at the cutting edge of image quality”.

Support for high-definition 4k displays will headline a series of collaborative updates between Nvidia and Respawn.

The developers are taking advantage of Nvidia’s GameWorks - a collection of technologies and tools including visual and physical simulation software, debuggers, algorithms, engines and libraries.

Nvidia’s people are working with Respawn’s engineers and artists to incorporate as much of this menagerie of stuff into Titanfall as possible. On our end, we can expect to see things like temporal anti-aliasing - a space-age cinema technique which reduces flickering when in motion. Which is great, because motion is what Titanfall’s about.

“TXAA creates a smooth, clear image by combining high-quality multi-sample anti-aliasing, post processes, and Nvidia-designed filters,” write Nvidia. “It’s the highest quality anti-aliasing technique out there, and delivers the stunning visuals that a groundbreaking game like Titanfall deserves.”

Elsewhere, Titanfall will take advantage of horizon based ambient occlusion: lifelike shadows, in laypilot’s terms, which use advanced algorithms to react accurately to the position of nearby objects.

This is all “high-end PC” stuff, as you might imagine, and you’ll need to own a Geforce something to take advantage. But do you think you might?

Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
nu1mlock avatarHideous Mutant Freek avatar
nu1mlock Avatar
4 Years ago

This feels pretty useless seeing the game doesn't even have good enough looking textures for non-4K displays. I mean, it doesn't look bad or anything (although certainly worse than other AAA titles released the last few years), I'm just saying.

Hideous Mutant Freek Avatar
4 Years ago

Yea, that is sort of what happens when you use a ten year old engine for a supposed next gen game. I guess it's nice to see companies working together like this but like you said it just doesn't seem worth it for this game.

nu1mlock Avatar
4 Years ago

Oh, yeah, it's great that they're doing - whatever they are actually doing. Using the Source engine shouldn't be a problem. They've HEAVILY modified it (according to themselves) so adding high-resolution textures shouldn't be a problem at all.

But then again, they are CoD developers. They might be the "good" CoD developers but they are still CoD developers.

It's not hard to include higher resolution textures. But then again, we're talking about the people that thought 35GB out of 50GB should be audio. Audio for ALL (supported) languages even though every single user will only use one language. That's just plain stupid.