The curse is winning: physical version of Dark Souls 2 delayed for a week in the UK

Who cares about Facebook? 25,000 second-generation Oculus Rifts sold

Guild Wars 2's April Feature Pack will improve the quality of life in Tyria

Blizzard talks the mistakes of training players to hunt for quest markers, and how pet battles won the hearts of the community

Through the years of World of Warcraft, you could say Blizzard have been pretty good at keeping players engaged. It’s not always been easy though. Lead Game Designer for World of Warcraft Tom Chilton has explained how new content has sometimes backfired on them as they failed to take into account changing player expectations. 

“We shot ourselves in the foot when we removed the limit on the daily quests that you could do,” explained Chilton to us at Gamescom. “So there was a pressure to maximise everything… and that really leads [players] to burn out.” He concedes that the daily quest goals should be “more general”, allowing players to focus their efforts on other, perhaps more important areas. 

Arguably the most upsetting thing for Chilton is players’ refusal to explore Azeroth, instead running straight to quest givers without taking the time to take in the beauty of the world. “I think we’ve really trained players over the years to say “If there’s no quest or mark on the map that tells me to go in that cave, I’m wasting my time.”” To combat this, Chilton is looking to resurrect the sense of discovery that players feel during their first hours in World of Warcraft. The Timeless Isle zone was designed specifically to achieve that. With different things happening at different times randomly across the area, players are forced to discover things for themselves without the aid of NPCs. 

Chilton also recognised that some content didn’t backfire, but required Blizzard to wait for player attitudes to change. Pet Battles was the big example. “Overall we’ve been super happy with it. The response we’ve gotten to it compared to archaeology is just night and day. I think a lot of players went into it being very sceptical, and ended up becoming completely absorbed into the whole pet collection and levelling up gameplay.”

The pet battles are the perfect demonstration of how Chilton judges the success of any new content. “We’ll watch the level of engagement, we’ll see how many players are doing the content, whether or not they’ll continue to do the content, how long it lasts and then we’ll also evaluate it as players ourselves,” he explained. It’s a system that seems to have worked well enough to keep World of Warcraft a remarkably fresh experience for eight years. Blizzard may have stumbled and shot themselves in the foot a couple of times here or there, but for most of WoW’s life to date, Azeroth has provided plenty of player-pleasing content. It’s a trend that doesn’t appear to be stopping anytime soon, with Siege of Orggrimmar on its way

Login or Register
2
+2
-0
Dog Pants's picture

Interesting that he's upset about the refusal to explore. I loved searching the nooks and crannies for the little details, but what ultimately drove me to following the X was that in order to get to places I had to fight my way there. Combat after combat after combat of pressing a sequence of buttons just to have a wander about, and it becomes a chore so I took the path of least resistance. People watch entire series of TV programs while doing it. If they want players to explore, let them do it.

1
+1
-0
Tim Edwards's picture

I think that's a really insightful point.  

1
+1
-0
Arakkoa's picture

That's so true. It's their "everything must be a challenge" mentality that really hurts exploration. When I want to explore but keep hitting mobs that I have to use a very specific strategy on just to kill them (ahem, Isle of Giants) I will just leave the damn place. If I wanted a challenging fight, I'd go do an LFR or something.

1
+1
-0
Dog Pants's picture

I thought of a simple solution to give them the best of both: have lower level creatures avoid you. That way you could do your exploring at a higher level and not be harrassed by one-hit monsters every couple of steps. It could have other effects admittedly, like high level players escorting low level players so they don't get attacked, but then is that a bad thing?

PCGamesN

Heroes of the Storm: "a triumph"

Azeroth Choppers: World of Warcraft does American Choppers, and nothing makes sense any more

Hearthstone single-player mode will chuck players into the necropolis of Naxxramas

World of Tanks' average players spend three times as much as League of Legends players

We can rebuild him: Blizzard showcases the new and improved male tauren

Slower healing and "squished" character stats: WoW is changing for Warlords of Draenor

PCGamesN

Hearthstone review

World of Warcraft player hits 85 on his "neutral" Pandaren; aims for 90

Win three rounds of Hearthstone and ride off into the sunset on the Hearthsteed

Cancel your engagements: Hearthstone just launched

World of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor now available for pre-purchase; could launch in autumn

MMO ecognomics: Warlords of Draenor trailer flaunts new character model and animations

PCGamesN

The best Hearthstone decks for beginners

Warcraft movie star Dominic Cooper talks the "terrifying" task of appeasing Blizzard fans

The Midas touch: Hearthstone's golden heroes coming with the next patch

Mists of Pandaria Digital Deluxe edition being put to rest

Blizzard will price World of Warcraft level 90 boost at $60 to avoid "devaluing" levelling

The War in Warcraft: WoW PvP Season 15 begins

World of Warcraft

Hearthstone beta first impressions: "I fear this game will destroy the planet."

Still no beards: Warlords of Draenor's new female dwarf model revealed

Bringing World of Warcraft's female orc into the modern age

$60 boost to level 90 appears in World of Warcraft shop

Warlords of Draenor to bring back Skirmishes and add a PvP spectator mode

Don’t call it a decline: World of Warcraft subscriptions are back up a bit