If you want to play Far Cry 5 in 4K at 60fps it's going to cost you $2,500 | PCGamesN

If you want to play Far Cry 5 in 4K at 60fps it's going to cost you $2,500

Far Cry 5

The recommended specs have been released for Ubisoft’s next big triple-A title, Far Cry 5. Despite the lack of SLI and Crossfire support from game devs, and the tech largely being ditched by Nvidia and AMD themselves, Far Cry 5 will support dual-card rigs in a quest to reach 4K 60fps - but it won’t come cheap.

Not fussed on 4K? Here are the best gaming monitors for any resolution.

The recommended specs for running Far Cry 5 at 4K and 60fps are certainly demanding. It’s no surprise considering the Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti - the most powerful single gaming GPU available in the market today - struggles to consistently manage that feat in many recently launched triple-A titles. To crank those rookie frame rates up from 30 to 60, you’ll need to grab yourself tandem graphics cards.

Dual Nvidia GTX 1080s, or AMD Vega 56s, are required. If you want to push those 8.3 million pixels around the screen at a decent speed you’ll need to pay the miner’s tax - that is, the now excessive pricing for a GPU thanks to miners gobbling them all up before they even reach the shelves. Not even some recent lip-service from Nvidia is going to change the fact that graphics cards are ridiculously priced right now.

Nvidia SLI

A standard GTX 1080 retails for around $850 (£680), while Nvidia’s original MSRP for the same card is $549 (£529). Be thankful two GTX 1080 Ti cards are not required because they retail for well over $1300 (£930) a piece.

The CPU recommended specs aren’t exactly minimal either, you’ll need the flagship Intel Skylake i7 6700K or AMD Ryzen 7 1700X to cope. Thankfully miners don’t care for these so prices haven’t been going ballistic for CPUs. But don’t forget the 16GB of pricey DDR4 memory, too. All in all, with a fairly minimal rig - at least considering what would usually accompany dual GTX 1080s - you are looking at a build valued at somewhere in the ballpark of $2,500.

There is potentially a way out. A way to play 4K at 60 fps in Far Cry without selling your organs on the black market or dropping your quality down to a measly ‘medium’. It also might mean you can ditch the often unstable SLI. Nvidia’s Volta is expected to launch within GDDR6-powered gaming cards sometime early this year. In fact, the Game Developer’s Conference (GDC) and Nvidia’s GPU Technology Conference (GTC) sandwich the launch of Ubisoft’s Far Cry 5 at the end of March. Coincidence? I think not.

Okay, fine. It’s probably coincidence.

But there is still some chance that you won’t be needing dual GTX 1080s to power a 4K 60fps experience when the game finally launches. Maybe it’s a pipe dream, and maybe Nvidia won’t release their next-gen cards in March, and maybe Miners will snatch up all the cards off the shelves again and we will be back at square one…. I’m holding out hope, if only because dropping $2,500 on a machine for 4K 60fps in the latest titles is a huge drag.

Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
Infidel avatarDave James avatarIluv2raceit avatarwmjbottriell avatar
wmjbottriell Avatar
1 Month ago

I originally wanted to post a response proving that you can do it for much cheaper but in the process managed to prove you mostly right..

So my worked relatively hard to find good deals and my setup is as follows...

Heavily used but completely functional and highly overclockable Asus ROG strix 1080ti purchased from an ex miner that offloaded 20 1080ti's on ebay a couple months ago.


Intel 4690k Devil's Canyon i5 steadily overclocked at 3.9ghz

$200 on ebay (two years ago, probably cheaper now)

Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400MHz 16GB ram

$99 on sale at newegg

Pixio PX347c Prime 3440x1440 curved Ultrawide monitor 34inches @ a100HZ refresh rate.

$499 (refurbished but good as new) Amazon.com or Newegg has a couple left I believe. There were 8 available when I ordered mine a couple weeks ago. Regular price is $699. (Amazing company by the way) Owned by gamers and great customer service,

My psu, all of the fans, mini itx mobo and bitfenix prodigy tower and all of my gaming peripherals (corsair strafe rgb keyboard and logitech g900 wireless mouse) are mostly irrelevant towards the video quality but FC5 integrates corsair RGB keyboards nicely into the gameplay, so that's a bonus. Anyways all together that stuff only me about $350 total.

I get about 60-90fps on maxed out settings running my monitor at it's native resolution, which isn't actually even 4k technically. It's on the high end of 2k but I would choose it over a true 4k monitor with more vertical screen space.

So thats, $1949 + $50 for the game of course

$1,999 TOTAL

Everything that I purchased was at least lightly used and I literally got the absolute best deal possible.


Infidel Avatar
4 Months ago

People complain that graphics cards are expensive right now but I remember buying my first graphics card which was 512mb card at $400 years ago. Now I can get a 4gb card for $200. Graphics cards have actually gone down in price when you consider inflation. Yes. If you want a 6gb or higher its going to cost you. Just like an i7 is going to cost you.... duuuuuhhhh.

Dave James Avatar
4 Months ago

Think you might struggle to grab any 4GB card for £200 at the moment.

The historical difference though is that $400 - $500 was the price of the top end-card back then. With the Kepler generation of Nvidia cards that became the price for their second-tier GPUs with the top-end chips then being dropped into the $1,000 Titan. That's quite a jump in pricing... and in margins.

And now we've a GPU from the bottom rung, with a $140 MSRP, being sold for over $500 at retail.

Graphics cards are ridiculously expensive right now, and unnecessarily so.

Iluv2raceit Avatar
4 Months ago

Actually, not entirely correct. There are several games today that do 'care' and do use more than 4 cores. BF1, Battlefront II, Destiny 2, The Division, and many more use more than 4 cores. Future games will also do the same.

Iluv2raceit Avatar