What is the best gaming monitor? With OLED gaming monitors now commonplace, we're starting to see them dominate the top spots on this best gaming monitor guide. However, they still demand a high price, so in this guide you'll find a wide range of LCD options too, with choices that are best for 1080p esports gaming, best for 4K, and of course the best if you're on a really tight budget. We've tested loads of options to find the best options whatever your needs.
The best gaming monitor overall is the LG Ultragear 32GS95UE. This 4K 32-inch panel can do everything, hitting 240Hz at 4K and 480Hz at 1080p while producing dazzling OLED image quality - it's a stunner. Our budget choice is the Dell G2524H, which is ideal for 1080p esports gaming for around $200. For 1440p gaming, our pick is the MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED that offers OLED image quality and speed for a decent price. See the full list below for more recommendations and check out the How to choose and FAQ sections to learn more about what to look for in a gaming monitor. Also, don't miss the Also Tested section that lists monitors we've tested that didn't quite make the grade to be top of our list.
Why you can trust our advice ✔ At PCGamesN, our experts spend hours testing hardware and reviewing games and VPNs. We share honest, unbiased opinions to help you buy the best. Find out how we test.
Best gaming monitors 2025:
LG Ultragear 32GS95UE
Best gaming monitor overall
LG Ultragear 32GS95UE specifications:
| Screen size |
32-inch |
| Native resolution |
4K and 1080p |
| Refresh rate |
240Hz and 480Hz |
| Panel type |
OLED (LG WOLED) |
Pros
- Great overall image quality
- Can do 4K at 240Hz and 1080p at 480Hz
- Can run 1080p at 27-inch and 24-inch equivalent sizes
Cons
- Not as sharp as LCD 4K screens of equivalent size
- High price
If you're after the one gaming monitor that can do it all right now, the LG Ultragear 32GS95UE is it. Thanks to its ability to switch between running at a 4K resolution at a 240Hz refresh rate and a 1080p resolution at a 480Hz refresh rate it offers the best of both worlds. Whether you're looking to run some games at stunning detail levels and others at ultra-fast frame rates, it can do the lot.
Not only is this large, 32-inch screen versatile with its resolutions and refresh rates but its OLED panel also delivers fantastic image quality with deep contrast, dazzling colors and a dizzyingly fast response time that means games run at 480Hz look incredibly smooth. All this and the screen even has half decent speakers.
There are just three slight downsides. One is that this panel doesn't completely do away with the slight colored fringing that can add a shimmering effect to the edges of high contrast objects such as text when viewed on OLEDs. It's much more subtle here than other OLEDs we've tested but it makes this panel just a little less sharp than an equivalent LCD.
The second factor is that OLEDs still have an inherent limited life due to the panel technology degrading over time. You'll still get many years of use out of a panel but if you're looking for a display that will withstand being on all day, everyday for work, and hours more for gaming, an LCD may still suit you more.
Finally, there's the price. At an MSRP of $1,299, this is one pricey panel. But, if we were saving up right now, this is the display we'd set our sights on.
Find out more in our LG Ultragear 32GS95UE review.
Dell G2524H
Best 1080p gaming monitor
Dell G2524H specifications:
| Screen size |
24.5-inches |
| Native resolution |
1,920 x 1,080 |
| Max refresh rate |
280Hz |
| Panel type |
IPS |
Pros
- High refresh rate at a low price
- It looks fantastic
- Good IPS panel viewing angles
Cons
- Not HDR
- Poor response times
If you're after a monitor that's good for esports but won't cost a fortune, this is just about the cheapest option you're going to find. It's not long ago that the first 360Hz monitor was released and it cost $750. Here we are now and the G2524H is not only less than $500, but even less than $250.
Going for a budget choice does come with a few limitations, though, such as the lack of HDR and rather slow 7.8ms response times. The latter means that despite its fast 360Hz refresh rate, this display isn't immune to ghosting and other issues related to a slow-responding LCD display. It's still great for fast gaming but just not as good as more expensive 360Hz displays.
The other obvious limitation here if this is only a 1080p display, so it's not going to deliver an awe-inspiring image when watching 4K video. However, if you just want a really speedy gaming monitor for playing the likes of Fortnite and CS2 without spending megabucks, it's a great buy.
Read our full Dell G2524H review.
MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED
Best 1440p OLED gaming monitor
MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED specifications:
| Screen size |
27-inch |
| Native resolution |
2,560 x 1,440 |
| Max refresh rate |
360Hz |
| Panel type |
OLED (QD-OLED) |
Pros
- Amazingly fast gaming performance
- Handles HDR content well
- Cheaper than last gen OLED displays
Cons
- Still expensive for 27-inches
- Not many features
- Questionable design choices
The MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED is an incredibly capable monitor, offering blazing-fast gaming performance thanks to its speedy OLED response time and 360Hz refresh rate. Its image quality is also fantastic, with HDR that although it doesn't get dazzlingly bright is still really absorbing. Crucially, it also handles text much better than WOLED monitors like the AOC AG276QZD so is decent for work as well as play.
It is a very no-frills monitor, though, with few extra features, such as speakers. Its design isn't all that interesting either. What's more, in general, the value of 27-inch OLED gaming monitors is questionable, as you can get a much bigger OLED screen for not that much more money. That said, this MSI offers amongst the best value for a screen of its type right now and is an ideal option for those wanting an great all-rounder screen for blisteringly fast gaming and everything else too.
Just be aware that if you need a monitor for gaming and all-day work duties, you might be better off with an LCD, as OLEDs can suffer from burn-in. The Asus PG27AQN would be a great alternative to this panel for those sorts of situations.
Read our full MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED review.
AOC Agon Pro AG276QZD
Best budget 1440p OLED monitor
AOC Agon Pro AG276QZD specifications:
| Screen size |
27-inch |
| Native resolution |
2,560 x 1,440 |
| Max refresh rate |
240Hz |
| Panel type |
OLED (LG WOLED) |
Pros
- Fantastic gaming performance
- Excellent overall image quality
- Lowest-price OLED you can buy
Cons
- Text clarity is poor
- Colored fringing on high contrast areas
- Frustrating menu controls
As consistently one of the cheapest known-brand OLED gaming monitors available, the AOC Agon Pro AG276QZD is inherently tempting. Crucially, that value temptation isn't misguided as this is indeed a fantastic gaming display.
The combination of its ultra-fast OLED response time with its 240Hz refresh rate of 2,560 x 1,440 resolution makes it a great all-rounder for gaming, able to turn its hand to high-speed competitive FPS or more graphically rich HDR games. Video looks lovely on it too.
Where it falls down slightly its ability to produce sharp, easy-to-read text. Its pixel density combined with the LG WOLED panel it uses can make text look a little fuzzy - far worse than an LCD of this size and resolution - and produce noticeable red/blue/green dot colored edges to text and other high-contrast edges. As such, it's not our top choice for an all-round work and gaming display but is great if entertainment is your main focus.
Read our full AOC Agon Pro AG276QZD review.
Asus ROG Swift PG27AQN
Best 1440p LCD monitor
Asus ROG Swift PG27AQN specifications:
| Screen size |
27-inches |
| Native resolution |
2,560 x 1,440 |
| Max. refresh rate |
360Hz |
| Panel type |
IPS |
Pros
- ULMB 2 is a game changer
- Built-in Nvidia Reflex Analyzer
- Great SDR brightness
Cons
- Expensive
- No USB-C DP Alt. Port
- Not a huge upgrade for existing 240Hz owners
For many gamers, nothing else will do than to have an OLED gaming monitor, thanks to their lightning-fast response time and effectively infinite contrast. However, if you're after a display that balances being great for work as well as blazing fast gaming, the Asus ROG Swift PG27QAN is it.
The crucial aspect here is that OLED displays suffer from two issues right now. One is that they tend to have less sharpness for any given screen size and resolution, which can particularly result in text looking a bit fuzzy. Combine that with the fact that OLEDs can suffer from burn-in, especially when used all day for static images like Word documents and email, and you have several reasons to consider an LCD instead. And, as far as LCD gaming monitors go, the PG27AQN is perhaps the ultimate one.
With a blazing-fast 360Hz maximum refresh rate combined with a 1440p resolution, this 27-inch IPS LCD panel can deliver super speedy gaming while providing a great screen size and resolution combination for work. What's more, this panel has a really fast response time for an LCD, plus you get official Nvidia G-Sync support with a built in Reflex Analyzer for assessing the latency of your PC.
All this and the PG27AQN can deliver impressive DisplayHDR 600-grade HDR and it can switch to an esports mode where it runs at 1080p in a 25-inch size window.
It's an incredibly expensive display for a 27-inch LCD but it is also clearly the best 27-inch LCD around and an absolute monster for both competitive gaming and more mundane desktop duties.
Read our Asus ROG Swift 360Hz PG27AQN review.
MSI MAG 325CQRF QD
Best curved gaming monitor
MSI MAG 325CQRF QD specifications:
| Screen size |
31.5-inches |
| Native resolution |
2,560 x 1,440 |
| Max refresh rate |
180Hz |
| Panel type |
Rapid VA |
Pros
- Value is incredible
- Color range out guns many IPS panels
- Super responsive
If you want a display that can deliver a high contrast image for bringing video and cinematic games to life while also providing a slightly wraparound view to draw you into the image, the MSI MAG 325CQRF QD is the display you want.
For just over $300, you get a 27-inch LCD panel with a 1440p resolution and a 180Hz refresh rate. What does that mean? It means this panel is a great value all-rounder. It can turn its hand to working all day, to firing up visually stunning games, and to gaming to a reasonably competitive level. It's not the last word in high speed gaming performance for esports games but it's fast enough for many gamers.
Read our MSI MAG 325CQRF QD review for more.
Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144
Best 4K LCD gaming monitor
Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 specifications:
| Screen size |
32-inches |
| Native resolution |
3,840 x 2,160 |
| Max refresh rate |
144Hz |
| Panel type |
IPS |
Pros
- High resolution and refresh rate IPS panel
- Produces accurate and vivid colors
Cons
- Lacks proper local dimming for HDR
- 1ms response time requires Adaptive Sync to be disabled
We've long been of the belief that if you're going to have a 4K screen for a gaming monitor, there's no point going smaller than a 32-inch panel. Yes, technically you can make out the extra sharpness when using a smaller screen but the day to day benefits are tiny.
That's why the Corsair Xeneon 32UDH144 is a great option for those seeking a 4K panel that's great for all uses. Crucially, while the LG 32GS95UE is amazing, its use of an OLED panel means it's super expensive plus the susceptibility of OLED to suffer from burn in means it's not as well suited for work as an LCD like the 32UDH144. You can leave this display on 24/7 with a full white image and it will suffer no ill effects. The same can't be said for an OLED.
Along with this core ability for LCD to survive the rigors of all-day use, this panel also provides great image and reasonably speedy gaming performance. At a maximum refresh rate of 144Hz, it's not ideal for really competitive gaming but it's great for a smooth feel when playing more cinematic games. The main caveat to this display's performance is its meager HDR. It looks merely ok.
Read our Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 review for more information.
Alienware AW2725QF
Best 4K and 1080p LCD gaming monitor
Alienware AW2725QF specifications:
| Screen size |
27-inch |
| Native resolution |
4K and 1080p |
| Refresh rate |
160Hz (overclockable to 180Hz) and 360Hz |
| Panel type |
IPS LCD |
Pros
- Can do both 4K at 180Hz and 1080p at 360Hz
- Great overall image quality
- Decent value
Cons
- Response time is a bit sluggish
- Contrast can't compete with OLED
- IPS glow quite noticeable
If you're looking for a single 27-inch gaming monitor to do it all, the Alienware AW2725QF should be at the top of your list. Its IPS LCD panel packs in a 4K resolution, providing a pin-sharp image that looks stunning in games and video and is incredibly useful for a wide range of uses. It can even run that 4K resolution at up to 180Hz to provide a really smooth feel when gaming.
The really neat trick with this display, though, is that it can be switched to run at 1080p with a refresh rate of up to 360Hz. That transforms this display from one able to provide a nicely smooth feel for AAA, high-detail games into one that's pushing the limits of competitive, ultra-high refresh rate gaming. The response time of the panel is a little on the slow side for such a high refresh rate, at 4.1ms, but its still a lot faster than the cheaper Dell G2524H and still makes for a decently fast experience overall.
Meanwhile, contrast can't compete with OLED panels and the display does suffer a bit from what's known as IPS Glow but these are reasonable compromises considering everything else the display can do and that's it's very reasonably priced.
Read our full Alienware AW2725QF review for more.
Alienware AW3423DW
Best ultrawide OLED gaming monitor
Alienware AW3423DW specifications:
| Screen size |
34-inches (ultrawide) |
| Native resolution |
3,440 x 1,440 |
| Max refresh rate |
175Hz |
| Panel type |
QD-OLED |
Pros
- Per-pixel local dimming makes for a fantastic HDR experience
- Ultrawide 21:9 1440p resolution with a 175Hz refresh rate
Cons
- Risk of burn-in
- Brightness and contrast suffer in well-lit rooms
With the advent of OLED display technologies, genuinely great high dynamic range gaming is slowly but surely becoming more of a reality. Now, the Alienware AW3423DW is here to put all the longstanding pretenders on the market to shame.
Armed with a QD-OLED panel, the ultrawide gaming monitor features 1,000 nits peak brightness and an infinite contrast ratio. All of this contributes to an unrivaled HDR performance, and it's much cheaper than some of its competitors to boot.
Its 21:9 panel boasts a native resolution of 3440×1440, a whopping 175Hz refresh rate, and a 0.1ms response time that all make for a wonderfully responsive gaming experience.
Read our Alienware AW3423DW review.
Philips Evnia 34M2C8600
Best monitor for video and AAA games
Philips Evnia 34M2C8600 specifications:
| Screen size |
34-inch |
| Native resolution |
3,440 x 1,440 |
| Max. refresh rate |
175Hz |
| Panel type |
OLED (QD-OLED) |
Pros
- Ambiglow brings video to life
- Ultrawide view is great for video and AAA games
- Stylish design
- Reasonable speakers
Cons
- Low maximum brightness
- Fairly poor text quality
The Philips Evnia 34M2C8600 stands out from the crowd thanks in part because of its stylish, white and silver design but primarily because of the addition of Philips' Ambiglow technology to this OLED gaming panel. Ambiglow has been around on Philips TVs for years and it essentially consists of lights on the back of the panel that shine light onto the wall behind the TV. Crucially, the lighting color matches what's being shown on screen.
The addition of Ambiglow means this display is just so absorbing when watching video or playing atmospheric, graphically-rich games. The wash of color spilling from the back of the panel really does enhance the experience.
All this and this panel's use of a Samsung QD-OLED panel means you get true blacks with effectively infinite contrast, making for an even more deep, absorbing and rich view. However, this is a slightly older OLED panel - from 2023 - so its maximum brightness is behind the latest panels and even though it has a decent 3,440 x 1,440 resolution, its text clarity isn't great (OLED's just don't look as smooth as LCDs when it comes to text right now). As such, it's a great display for gaming and video but not a great all-rounder option for work and play.
Read our full Philips Evnia 34M2C8600 review for more information.
Lenovo Legion R34-30
Best budget ultrawide gaming monitor
Lenovo Legion R34-30 specifications:
| Screen size |
34-inch |
| Resolution |
3,440 x 1,440 |
| Refresh rate |
180Hz |
| Panel type |
VA LCD |
Pros
- High 3,000:1 contrast
- Smooth 180Hz gaming
- Versatile size/resolution combination
- Can be had for bargain price
Cons
- Too expensive at MSRP
- Can't compete with IPS, TN, or OLED for response
- No HDR
The Lenovo Legion R34-30 isn't setting any new records in image quality or gaming performance but if you're after an ultrawide, 34-inch gaming monitor with solid performance across the board for a not crazy price, it's a decent bet. However, that's based on it already being discounted from its original $450 MSRP. Get this display for the <$350 we've seen it listed for and it's a good buy.
As it uses a VA LCD panel, this display boasts a decently high contrast ratio of precisely 2,987:1 in our tests, providing a deep black level that brings a depth to its image.
What's more, despite VA panels being notorious for having a slower response than other types of LCD - and far slower than OLED - it performed decently in our tests. Its 3.73ms average initial response time is ample when combined with its 180Hz refresh rate for getting a snappy-feel during fast-paced gaming sessions.
Read our full Lenovo Legion R34-30 review for more information.
Samsung Odyssey G9 G95SC
Best superwide gaming monitor
Samsung Odyssey G9 G95SC specifications:
| Screen size |
49-inches |
| Native resolution |
5,120 x 1,440 |
| Max refresh rates |
240Hz |
| Panel type |
OLED (QD-OLED) |
Pros
- Massive screen resolution for the money
- Fantastic gaming performance
- Built-in Wi-Fi and smart TV features
Cons
- HDR isn't actually that exciting
- OLED burn-in a concern
- Not everyone wants smart TV stuff
The Samsung G9 G95SC is one of the ultimate gaming monitors you can buy right now. With its huge 49-inch expensive, it's the same size as two 27-inch monitors sat side-by-side. It combines that colossal size with a massive 5,120 x 1,440 resolution (again equivalent to two 1440p 27-inch displays) for a truly jaw-dropping expereience.
Not only is this display massive but its use of a Samsung QD-OLED panel means you get amazing visuals too. It has effectively infinite contrast and dazzling HDR colors that bring movies, games, and more to life. In some ways it's almost too big for most games - and is even too wide for most ultrawidescreen movies too - but when its full size is filled it's amazing.
You also get a blazing-fast 240Hz refresh rate so this display can really rip when it comes to competitive gaming, though we'd recommend running most competitive titles in a smaller window than trying to fill the whole panel.
All that and this massive monitor also includes great and even has built-in WiFi with smart TV features that can be controlled by a remote control. The latter do kind of just get in the way for normal PC use, but it's still a cool extra.
Crucially, all this comes at a not crazy price. It's an expensive panel but considering its size, it's actually pretty spectacular value.
Read our Samsung Odyssey G9 G95SC review for more information.
Sony Inzone M9
Best HDR LCD gaming monitor
Sony Inzone M9 specifications:
| Screen size |
27-inches |
| Native resolution |
3,840 x 2,160 |
| Max refresh rate |
144Hz (G-Sync and Freesync) |
| Panel type |
IPS (Full-array 96 local dimming zones) |
Pros
- Amazing response times
- Sharp image and accurate colors
- Good HDR and SDR brightness
Cons
- Expensive
- Dodgy KVM switch
- Poor contrast
Sony's big entrance into PC gaming monitors is an interesting one as it's really standout feature isn't necessarily one you'd expect, which is amazing HDR. Thanks to it housing dozens of indivudual backlights, rather than using a single uniform backlight, it can brighten or dim the lights depending on what you're viewing, allowing the night sky to be inky-black while a headlight dazzles your face.
Not only does this result in some of the best HDR available on an LCD monitor but Sony has also equipped this display with a 4K resolution, making for an incredibly sharp image. Add in the ability to run at up to 144Hz and this monitor really can do just about everything. Plus, of course, it can deliver the full range of capabilities of the PS5 Pro, if you want to also plug in your console.
What's more, right now this monitor is incredibly value in the US, costing under $500. Sadly, in other regions it's not so competitively price, with the UK pricing making it very expensive, though still cheaper than the Asus PG27AQN. If you're wondering which of the two to get, the Asus is best for faster, competitive gaming, the Sony is better for everything else.
Read our Sony Inzone M9 review.
Acer Predator X45
Best racing/flight sim monitor
Acer Predator X45 specifications:
| Screen size |
44.5-inch |
| Native resolution |
3,440 x 1,440 |
| Refresh rate |
240Hz |
| Panel type |
OLED (WOLED) |
Pros
- Huge, wraparound image
- Absorbing high contrast image quality
- Super fast response
Cons
- Low pixel density bad for reading text
- Takes up a lot of space
The big appeal of this monitor is its huge size and wraparound 800R curve. This makes it amazing for use as a single screen for racing and flight sims games. It can't quite replace a multi-monitor setup but it's the next best thing.
Crucially, this size is matched with fantastic image quality thanks to the incredible contrast and color reproduction of this screen's OLED panel. Its 240Hz refresh rate and ultra-rapid response time also mean it can hold up to the fastest user inputs and still provide a really-responsive feel.
The key downside to consider is that its 3,440 x 1,440 resolution, while plenty for most uses, results in quite a low pixel density on such a huge screen. Sit really close and it doesn't look amazingly sharp, which is why we wouldn't recommend this as a normal monitor for use on a desk, particularly not for a daily work screen. However, sit back a little with your flight stick, racing wheel, or game controller and this screen looks amazing.
Read our full Acer Predator X45 review for more.
Also tested - more gaming monitor reviews
How to choose the best gaming monitor
The first place to start when picking a gaming monitor is to consider what your priorities are. If money's no object, some of the top screens available can do everything well - such as is the case with the LG 32GS95UE - but in most instances, there's some compromise to be made.
As such, your first consideration should be the refresh rate of a screen. If you're into competitive esports FPS games, you'll want a very high refresh rate to ensure the image onscreen is updated as rapidly as possible, for peak accuracy. That's why we recommend 240Hz or higher screens for serious competitive gamers.
If you like to play reasonably fast-paced games but aren't super into the competitive scene, 120Hz+ is enough to bring a smooth, accurate feel to games while also providing niceties like smooth-looking scrolling and other animation on your desktop.
In general, if you're not at all into any sort of speedy gaming you can get away with a 60Hz screen - 60Hz has, after all, been good enough for consoles for a long time. However, even if you're on a really tight budget we'd still recommend looking out for an 85Hz or 100Hz screen to get just that slightly smoother look to your games and desktop scrolling - they can be had for well under $200. Outside of buying boring business displays, there really is very reason not to get a faster-than-60Hz display for gaming these days.
Once you've decided just how fast a screen you need, it's then time to look at size and resolution. If you're on a tight budget, you'll be forced to stick to screens with a 1080p resolution, which is fine for most games and just about does the job for most desktop use. On 24-inch screens, that resolution can look reasonably sharp but on 27-inch screens and larger it can look quite blocky, so we recommend moving up to a higher resolution.
Aiming for a 27-inch screen with a 1440p resolution is an ideal balance for most users. You get a screen that's big enough and high enough resolution for some desktop multitasking but that also looks reasonably sharp.
Meanwhile, if your budget can stretch to it - and your graphics card can handle it - 4K, 32-inch screens or even ultrawide and superwide screens are amazing. 4K is great if you're really into cinematic games and want a pin-sharp image that makes the most of your top-tier graphics card. Likewise, if you're into video or image editing, the extra resolution can be super useful.
As for ultrawide screens, these are generally 34-inch in size and offer what we consider an ideal balance of size and resolution. The extra width means you can easily fit two or three windows side-by-side plus the wider view (aspect ratio) is an ideal match for widescreen movies and works great for many games too.
Perhaps the ultimate gaming monitor option right now is the 49-inch super wide screen. These are even wider than an ultrawide screen and are big enough to fit three or four desktop windows side-by-side. However, as impressive as they are, they're too wide for most widescreen movies (so you end up with black bars at the sides) and many games don't support the extra width or start to feel a bit strange at such a wide view. However, these displays are fantastic for racing and flight sims, so again it depends on your priorities.
As for whether to go for LCD or OLED. LCDs can be brighter, don't suffer from burn-in, they're cheaper, and they produce a sharper image for any given pixel density. These factors mean LCDs are still ideal if you work at a screen all day then game at night - a 27-inch, 1440p model or 34-inch 1440p ultrawide are ideal.
Meanwhile, OLEDs are fantastic for gaming and video, thanks to their effectively infinite contrast, dazzling colors, and effectively instant response time. If you just want a screen for gaming, get an OLED, if you can afford it. However, at lower resolutions, OLEDs don't have the best looking text so aren't great for working at all day, plus they suffer from burn-in.
Burn-in, is where a display starts to show a permanent ghostly image of what it has shown before. This happens when a display is showing the same thing for a long time and is exacerbated by showing bright images. As such, OLEDs aren't ideal for screens that are sat showing Excel spreadsheets all day, for instance - you'll end up with a permanently visible grid over everything. Modern OLEDs cope much better than early ones and you can reduce the risk by using dark modes in apps, hiding th Windows taskbar, etc. However, it still means that some users may want to consider an OLED only for gaming/video and a second screen for work.
Gaming monitor frequently asked questions (FAQs)
OLED or LCD?
OLED is favored for the fact that each pixel emits its own light, which means when a pixel is off it shows complete darkness, resulting in effectively infinite contrast (the difference between the brightest and darkest a pixel can go). They also have very fast response times of under 0.1ms, which makes them fantastic for competitive, high refresh rate gaming.
LCDs, meanwhile, need a backlight to provide the display's light, which the LCD pixels then block to produce varying levels of brightness for each color. However, because the LCD can never fully block the light, normal LCDs can never show complete blackness. That's why they top out at typical contrast ratios of between 1,000:1 and 3,000:1. You can get LCDs with multi-zone backlights (often with miniLED backlights), which break the backlight into hundreds or even thousands of individual lights to massively boost the effective contrast of the screen, but these are rare and expensive.
LCDs are also much slower to respond than OLEDs, with real world average response times of typically around 1-5ms. This makes them a less ideal choice for the very fastest gaming styles, though they can still hold their own.
However, there are a few reasons why some buyers prefer LCD. For a start, LCDs tend to get much brighter overall, so if you game or work in a brightly lit room, an LCD may be a better choice. LCDs also tend to have slightly sharper image quality for any given resolution (due to the way the red, green, and blue sub-pixels are arranged), which makes them better for reading text.
The biggest factor of all, though, is OLED burn-in. This is where permanent ghostly images or stains appear on OLED panels where they've been used a lot. The longer and brighter a pixel is shown, the more it starts to permanently look a little brighter.
This makes OLEDs not well suited to desktop work. The white windows of web browsers and Word documents or the light gray of a Windows taskbar can get permanently etched into the screen. That's why we recommend caution for gamers wanting a screen they can work at all day as well as play on in the evening. There are steps you can take to mitigate the issue - using dark mode, reducing brightness, auto-hiding the Windows taskbar - but it's likely to catch up with you eventually, and the first signs can be visible within a few months of use.
For gamers just wanting a display for gaming or watching video, though, whether it's a secondary display or as a primary display for a PC that's generally only used in the evenings, OLED is a great option. Just be aware that they won't last basically forever like an LCD and that there's a good chance that in five years your OLED may have developed some burn-in.
Is 60Hz good for gaming?
60Hz monitors can be brilliant for gaming, so long as you only play slower styles of games. If you're into 2D indie games, slow-paced cinematic titles such as The Last of Us, or you like top-down city sims, a high refresh rate isn't a necessity. However, once you go higher it's hard to go back. Even just scrolling a web page on your desktop is nicer on faster screens, and the extra sense of precision and smooth motion brought to games can be transformative.
You don't need to jump up all that higher - even just 75Hz is noticeably better than 60Hz, but 120Hz is more than enough for most gaming and desktop use. For anyone into faster-paced games such as competitive first person shooter and racing games, there's little reason not to aim for at least a 240Hz display now, though, as they're relatively affordable.
Should I use two or more gaming monitors?
This comes down to personal preference and how you use your PC. If you only use a single screen when gaming and just need more screen space for extra windows when doing desktop activities, modern ultrawide and superwide monitors can provide that and give you a huge single image when required. That's especially true for flight and racing sim enthusiasts - a single superwide screen is amazing for these games.
However, if you like to game on one screen and have Discord or a video on another, a multi-monitor setup might be for you. Multi-monitor setups can be cheaper, both to buy outright and due to the fact that you can buy one monitor then add another later, and it's easier to get run the above sorts of setups with multi screens rather than running games in windowed mode on a single screen.
Of course, using additional monitors fully depends on your graphics card of choice, as you'll need appropriate display outputs. The extra screens could also make lower-spec GPUs sweat, which in turn can affect in-game performance.
Should I use Nvidia G-Sync or AMD Freesync?
Yes. It's nearly always better to use G-Sync or Freesync, though there are some cases where you might want to experiment with turning them off. We recommend generally keeping them turned on, but then don't be afraid of turning them off if you think you're noticing any performance/game-smoothness oddities. Nearly all modern monitors support Freesync on AMD graphics cards (or what's generically known as adaptive sync) and a lot work with G-Sync on Nvidia cards too. PCGamesN has a full guide on how to run AMD Freesync on an Nvidia GPU.
Is a curved or flat screen better for gaming?
This is largely a personal choice, but a curved option can be great for making games feel more immersive. This is particularly true for games from a first-person perspective, where it can recreate the feeling of peripheral vision: think shooters, racing sims, and flight sims. The wider the screen, the bigger the benefit of a curve, too. If you're buying a 34-inch ultrawide or 49-inch superwide panel, a curve can help improve the viewing angle of the edges of the screen. However, if the curve of a screen is too sharp it can look odd, especially if you're not sitting close to the screen in the sweet spot of its curve.
Is IPS, TN, or VA better?
This largely comes down to your needs as a gamer. TN is the fastest to respond, with average response times sometimes under 1ms and screens running up to 540Hz, making it a natural choice for competitive gaming, but its viewing angles are poor. Meanwhile, VA has the lowest black levels and highest resulting contrast, so it's great for atmospheric games and video but it's generally the slowest to respond so often isn't the best for competitive gaming. That's why we generally recommend IPS for most gamers. It has great viewing angles while generally having a faster response than VA, for a great balance of image quality and gaming response. Read our full IPS vs TN vs VA guide for a detailed breakdown of the differences.
What is ghosting?
Ghosting is where a screen's pixels take a while to fully change from one color to another and as a result, the overall image can look like there are ghostly trails behind moving parts of the image. This is also known as blur or smearing and it can be both distracting in general and downright game-ruining for faster-paced competitive gamers. A monitor's response time is the measurement to look for to avoid ghosting - the lower the better. OLED is the fastest tech out there (<1ms average), with old CRT screens also being very fast, while LCD screens are the slowest, with TN being the fastest type of LCD (typically under 3ms), IPS being a bit slower (<5ms) and VA generally being the slowest (<10ms).
If you've now found the ideal gaming monitor for your needs, why not check out our best graphics card or best gaming mouse guides to find more ways to get the most out of your gaming PC. Or, try out your new monitor with a safe and free FPS monitor test.