AMD’s Vega beats Nvidia’s GTX 1080 by up to 21% in Shadow of War at 4K

AMD Vega beats Nvidia in Shadow of War

How’s that Vega wine tasting now, AMD? Pretty good, I expect. Especially now we’ve got the latest Radeon graphics cards giving their GeForce rivals trouble in Shadow of War, and that coming hot on the heels of the realisation that AMD’s Vega is leaving the top-end Nvidia 10-series GPU eating its dust in Forza 7.

You’re going to need a great screen to go with your shiny GPU, so check out our list of the best gaming monitors around today.

We’ve done our own performance testing for Shadow of War, with regards to the sort of graphics cards that represent the chips-in-rigs of the vast majority of gamers, but unfortunately our Vega samples have been seconded to Poland by AMD and are still in transit back to the office.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 specs

Computer Base in Germany, however, have gone to town on the GPU testing. They’ve benchmarked Shadow of War with all the most recent graphics cards to see how they stack up in the open-world orc-fest.

The results highlight both how memory-intensive the game is, and just how well AMD’s latest Vega GPU architecture can deal with that sort of title. For the most part the AMD RX Vega 64 fell behind the Nvidia’s GTX 1080 in our gaming benchmarks when we first reviewed it - even in the high-res textured world of the game's prequel, Shadow of Mordor.

But with Shadow of War the Vega 64 is consistently out in front of the GeForce card. The difference is just 9% at 1080p and 1440p, but it stretches to a hefty 21% when the resolution is pushed up to 4K. Interestingly, it’s at 4K where the AMD RX Vega 56 also pulls away from the GTX 1080.

That’s a pretty impressive result for AMD, however it has to be said that AMD’s flagship GPU is still a lot more expensive than the Nvidia competition. The cheapest RX Vega 64 is $650 in the US, though is only £551 in the UK. That still puts it around $100, or £100, more expensive than the GTX 1080.

So you’d kinda hope it was delivering better numbers, right?

All the Shadow of War numbers were taken with AMD’s High Bandwidth Cache Controller turned off too, so there are no caching shenanigans going on. It’s all straight GPU and memory interface performance. 

AMD Radeon RX Vega fine wine

It’s setting an intriguing precedent for Vega’s future performance, and that could well be compounded by the imminent launch of Wolfenstein 2, with its use of the proprietary AMD Rapid Packed Math tech. That classic AMD 'fine wine' approach to their graphics architecture delivering improved performance over time was consistently pointed to during the Vega launch, and it seems to be happening.

Could Vega turn out to be a bit of an AMD vintage? It didn’t look like it at launch, but there is more and more evidence things could be turning around.

Paladins
Sign in to Commentlogin to comment
Firerod avatar1kca avatarJp0wNs avatarDave James avatarAktenschrank avatarKojiro(Bluescreen) avatar+1
Firerod Avatar
17
2 Months ago

That is 2 new games where vega is performing like it should

2
Dave James Avatar
460
2 Months ago

Aye, it's only two new games, but it's two of the biggest new titles released since Vega was. They may be the only two games where Vega outperforms its main rival, but only time will tell.

Still, kinda interesting though,eh? :)

1
Jp0wNs Avatar
6
2 Months ago

But where is it 21% better?

https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/middle_earth_shadow_of_war_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,5.html

1
QDP2 Avatar
883
2 Months ago

It was linked in the article, but here you go.

https://www.computerbase.de/2017-10/middle-earth-shadow-of-war-benchmark/2/#diagramm-mittelerde-schatten-des-krieges-3840-2160

1
1kca Avatar
28
2 Months ago

Very interesting. If only Vega was more readily available, or at least at RRP

2
Jp0wNs Avatar
6
2 Months ago

https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/middle_earth_shadow_of_war_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,5.html

1
Jp0wNs Avatar
6
2 Months ago

Forza 7 is so broke does it even count as a real win for Radeon? It is a in house game engine tailored to XBOX (AMD Hardware). Btw I love the franchise and have been experiencing all the PC troubles and even the XBOX crashes first hand.

1
Aktenschrank Avatar
2
2 Months ago

You may want to verify your source before making news. http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Mittelerde-Schatten-des-Krieges-Spiel-60746/Specials/Mittelerde-Schatten-des-Krieges-Benchmarks-1240756/

Pcgameshardware found out new AMD driver messed the settings to high not ultra. After retesting with HBCC on the Vega 64 LC is only 12% faster at 4K.

Also on Forza 7 GTX 1080 now beats Vega 64 at 4K with latest driver.

1
Dave James Avatar
460
2 Months ago

The Computer Base 4K benchmarks weren't run at Ultra settings, they were running at High.

But as I mentioned in the piece we cannot currently verify the results as our Vega samples are still being shipped back to us.

1
Jp0wNs Avatar
6
2 Months ago

If you are going to post something like this why not back it up?

1
Dave James Avatar
460
2 Months ago

The article you've linked to multiple times in these comments shows a 13% delta between the GTX 1080 and Vega 64 at 4K Ultra (with the Radeon in the lead). The 21% difference is at the High settings Computer Base was testing at.

1
Jp0wNs Avatar
6
2 Months ago

https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/middle_earth_shadow_of_war_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,5.html

1
Kojiro(Bluescreen) Avatar
3
2 Months ago

Dont worry, Nvidia will release another magic driver that puts the 1080 back ahead of Vega 64.

1